Public Atlas.
Public Atlas / Research / What changedResearch / What changed

Follow the change. Keep the context.

Seven- and thirty-day changes at six reservoirs, calculated from their own dated elevation series. Every comparison shows its baseline and source so you can check the result.

Choose your own dates in the lake-change explorer →

THE DATED EVIDENCE

How much has each lake risen or fallen?

Download comparisons · CSV

A positive value means a rise; a negative value means a fall. Changes are in feet of elevation, not percent full. These lakes have different reference systems and observation dates: compare a lake with its own history, rather than ranking their absolute elevations.

Exact-date changes calculated from accepted TWDB and CDEC snapshots
Reservoir / sourceLatest series date7-day change30-day change
Lake Travis
TWDB · twdb:lake-travis
Sep 28, 2026
674.77 ft
-0.80 ft
From Sep 21, 2026
675.57 ft → 674.77 ft
-4.01 ft
From Aug 29, 2026
678.78 ft → 674.77 ft
Canyon Lake
TWDB · twdb:canyon-lake
Sep 28, 2026
908.02 ft
-0.30 ft
From Sep 21, 2026
908.32 ft → 908.02 ft
-1.29 ft
From Aug 29, 2026
909.31 ft → 908.02 ft
Lake Corpus Christi
TWDB · twdb:lake-corpus-christi
Sep 28, 2026
91.67 ft
-0.26 ft
From Sep 21, 2026
91.93 ft → 91.67 ft
-1.00 ft
From Aug 29, 2026
92.67 ft → 91.67 ft
Medina Lake
TWDB · twdb:medina-lake
Sep 28, 2026
1020.63 ft
-0.33 ft
From Sep 21, 2026
1020.96 ft → 1020.63 ft
-1.25 ft
From Aug 29, 2026
1021.88 ft → 1020.63 ft
Shasta Lake
CDEC · cdec:SHA
Sep 27, 2026
982.45 ft
-1.59 ft
From Sep 20, 2026
984.04 ft → 982.45 ft
-9.66 ft
From Aug 28, 2026
992.11 ft → 982.45 ft
Lake Oroville
CDEC · cdec:ORO
Sep 27, 2026
757.68 ft
-8.81 ft
From Sep 20, 2026
766.49 ft → 757.68 ft
-35.39 ft
From Aug 28, 2026
793.07 ft → 757.68 ft
Folsom Lake
CDEC · cdec:FOL
Sep 27, 2026
407.35 ft
-0.92 ft
From Sep 20, 2026
408.27 ft → 407.35 ft
-5.33 ft
From Aug 28, 2026
412.68 ft → 407.35 ft

This report rebuilds with accepted source refreshes. A successful download date does not make an older observation current. Check feed health and observation ages →

READ THE DIFFERENCE

What these numbers can tell you.

They describe the direction and size of a change in a recorded elevation series. They do not establish why it happened, predict the next reading or determine recreation conditions.

Save a place and compare it with your previous visit →

Read the frozen research editions →

Why did the lake level change?

Elevation alone cannot identify a cause. Rainfall, inflows, releases, withdrawals and evaporation can all affect a reservoir. We do not assign a cause from a change in elevation without separate, dated operating or hydrologic evidence. Follow the operating agency for a specific explanation.

Is a fall in feet the same as a fall in percent full?

No. Percent full describes storage relative to the source’s capacity definition. Reservoir shape determines how a change in height translates into volume. A one-foot fall does not equal a one-percentage-point fall. Read the elevation and storage guide.

Why is a comparison unavailable?

Both endpoint dates must exist once in the accepted series and contain valid numbers. We subtract exactly seven or thirty calendar days from the latest series date. We do not interpolate, substitute a nearby date or turn a missing value into zero.

Does a falling level mean a lake is unsafe or closed?

No access or safety conclusion follows from these differences. Ramps, shorelines and operational restrictions require separate current checks. Open the lake’s agency record and local access notices before making plans.

Why are tides and river gauges absent?

This report uses daily reservoir elevation history. Our tide pages show predictions, while river pages use instantaneous gauge observations. Mixing those with daily reservoir readings would produce misleading comparisons. Understand gauge height and discharge.

Method and reproducibility

For each source series: change = latest dated elevation − elevation on the exact baseline date. Differences are rounded to two decimal places after subtraction. TWDB series dates and CDEC daily series dates are preserved; they are not assumed to be synchronized instants. Agency revisions may change a subsequent report. The CSV preserves baseline, latest value, dates, source identity, source URL and retrieval time; save it with a download date when citing it.

Full measurement methodology · Source-checking checklist · Station directory

Open the underlying history

SeriesSnapshot retrieved (UTC)Issuing source
Lake Travis2026-09-29T01:45:15.047ZTWDB dated history ↗
Source overview ↗
Canyon Lake2026-09-29T01:45:15.047ZTWDB dated history ↗
Source overview ↗
Lake Corpus Christi2026-09-29T01:45:15.047ZTWDB dated history ↗
Source overview ↗
Medina Lake2026-09-29T01:45:15.047ZTWDB dated history ↗
Source overview ↗
Shasta Lake2026-09-28T19:41:17.008ZCDEC dated history ↗
Source overview ↗
Lake Oroville2026-09-28T19:41:17.008ZCDEC dated history ↗
Source overview ↗
Folsom Lake2026-09-28T19:41:17.008ZCDEC dated history ↗
Source overview ↗

Compare Texas conservation storage →